ADVERTISING
 
Sunday, January 20   Sign in or Register
 
Evangelical Focus
 

 
ADVERTISING
 
 
FOLLOW US ON
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google +
  • Instagram
  • Soundcloud
 

Newsletter
Newsletter, sign up to receive all our News by email.
 

POLL
Bible literacy
How often do you read the Bible?







SEE MORE POLLS
 

 
TOP 10 MOST VIEWED



Roxana Stanciu
 

Is the European Parliament really upholding fundamental rights?

The Annual Report on the situation of fundamental rights in the EU is a narrow document, that misses some of the key elements related to the very topic that it purports to address.

EUROPEAN DIGNITY WATCH AUTHOR Roxana Stanciu 19 MARCH 2018 11:00 h GMT+1
European parliament. / Piabay.

The European Parliament adopted its Annual Report on the situation of fundamental rights in the EU on March 1, 2018.



The report – which is viewed as a critical instrument in upholding these rights in the EU – focuses on specific situations where the respect of fundamental rights is not ensured.



We note with concern, however, that it fails to draw sufficient attention to certain central issues which are ongoing.



The right to freedom of expression



One of the European Parliament’s concerns is “the alarming increase in manifestations of hatred, hate speech and fake news”. It therefore condemns incidents of “hate speech motivated by racism, xenophobia or religious intolerance or by bias against a person’s disability, sexual orientation or gender identity, which occur in the EU on a daily basis”.



Governmental elites are not immune from such behavior, notes the European Parliament, which“[c]ondemns the normalisation of hate speech sponsored or supported by authorities, political parties or political leaders and reported by social media.”



Members of the European Parliament who voted to approve this report by an overwhelming majority have failed to acknowledge one core problem: that there is no clear definition as to what constitutes ‘hate speech’.



At the EU level, the definition is vague and rather subjective. It also has not been considered in any major international human rights document or treaty, nor has it been defined by the European Court of Human Rights or by any other international court.



Nevertheless, European officials continue to consider any speech that can incite ‘hate’ as ‘hate speech’. But what if controversial views are considered by officials as inciting ‘hate’?



Under such a broad understanding, ‘hate speech’ could thus include any criticism of abortion, Islam, marriage legislation or mass migration – and would thus be considered a violation of fundamental rights.



Moreover, the fundamental right of freedom of expression that every European citizen benefits from can be threatened by such ‘hate speech’ claims.



Article 11 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights clearly states that “[e]veryone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.”



The Report adopted by the European Parliament fails to address this issue. It recalls the fundamental value of freedom of expression – but only in reference to journalists.



Freedom of expression, however, is and should be recognized as important for any European citizen as a fundamental element of democracy, as emphasized in European legislation.



Branislav Skripek MEP rightly pointed out: “If we come into a situation of being afraid to speak our mind, because someone will not agree with our viewpoint […] we will see fundamental rights and traditional European values disappear in the wind. […] We must have free speech to express opposing views [...] and to debate them without fear of violence or coercion”.



No mention of parental rights



The Report also stresses the importance of education for the development of values. It “[e]ncourages the inclusion in school curricula of education about the value of tolerance in order to provide children with the tools they need to identify all forms of discrimination.”



At the same time, it “[c]alls on the Commission to share Member States’ best practices for addressing gender stereotypes at school.”



But why is there no mention of any parental rights? The European Convention on Human Rights clearly protects the rights of parents.



In the context of the education and teaching of children, Article 2 states: “In the exercise of any functions which it assumes in relation to education and to teaching, the State shall respect the right of parents to ensure such education and teaching in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions”.



However, the Report on Fundamental Rights fails to acknowledge the primary responsibility of parents in the education of their children – thus undermining parental rights.



How about conscientious objection?



Another area overlooked in the Report is the right to conscientious objection. This right is enshrined in Article 10(2) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: “The right to conscientious objection is recognized, in accordance with the national laws governing the exercise of this right”.



But despite being given the opportunity to include amendments reaffirming the right to conscientious objection, MEPs failed to adopt any in the Report approved by the European Parliament.



In this, there is an unwillingness to recognize the problem. In fact, according to a Resolution adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in 2010, “in the vast majority of Council of Europe member states, the practice of conscientious objection is adequately regulated. There is a comprehensive and clear legal and policy framework governing the practice of conscientious objection by health-care providers ensuring that the interests and rights of individuals seeking legal medical services are respected, protected and fulfilled”.



It is thus of great concern to see that there is no mention of the right of conscientious objection in the Report on Fundamental Rights.



These are just a few of the problematic areas in the Annual Report on the situation of fundamental rights in the EU. As stated at the beginning, this report should really serve as an instrument to help uphold and protect fundamental rights across the EU.



However, based on how it has been drafted and what it has omitted, what we have instead is a narrow document that misses some of the key elements related to the very topic that it purports to address.



Is it, then, accomplishing its purpose? The answer is quite clear.



Roxana Stanciu, Executive Director of European Dignity Watch, based in Brussels. Learn more about how this organisation informs, educates, and equips stakeholders in Europe to make a difference in public life, defending freedom, family, and life; visit EDW's website.


 

 


0
COMMENTS

    If you want to comment, or

 



 
 
YOUR ARE AT: - - - Is the European Parliament really upholding fundamental rights?
 
ADVERTISING
 
 
 
AUDIOS Audios
 
Julia Doxat-Purser: 25 years of EEA office in Brussels Julia Doxat-Purser: 25 years of EEA office in Brussels

An interview with the socio-political representative of the European Evangelical Alliance about how evangelical Christians work at the heart of the European Union.

 
Lars Dahle: Nominal Christianity, a mission field for the church Lars Dahle: Nominal Christianity, a mission field for the church

An interview with Lars Dahle, of the Steering Committee of the Lausanne Movement Global Consultation on Nominal Christianity held in Rome.

 
Michael Ramsden: Communicating the Gospel in today’s societies Michael Ramsden: Communicating the Gospel in today’s societies

RZIM International Director Michael Ramsden responds to questions about the secularisation of Europe, the role of Christians in public leadership and the new ‘culture of victimism’.

 
PICTURES Pictures
 
Bulgaria: Evangelicals ask government to protect religious minorities Bulgaria: Evangelicals ask government to protect religious minorities

Christians rallied in Sofia on November 18 to defend their rights. It is the second Sunday of peaceful demonstrations against a new religion draft law that could severely restrict religious freedom and rights of minority faith confessions.

 
Photos: #WalkForFreedom Photos: #WalkForFreedom

Abolitionists marched through 400 cities in 51 countries. Pictures from Valencia (Spain), October 20.

 
Photos: Reaching people with disabilities Photos: Reaching people with disabilities

Seminars, an arts exhibition, discussion and testimonies. The European Disability Network met in Tallinn.

 
VIDEO Video
 
China rises 16 places in Open Doors World Watch List China rises 16 places in Open Doors World Watch List

There has been an serious increase in persecution of Christian communities in China in the last months.

 
The source of longing, according to C.S. Lewis The source of longing, according to C.S. Lewis

Jerry Root compares the search for meaning of C.S. Lewis with Saint Augustine's reflections.

 
The reliability of the Bible The reliability of the Bible

Jim Cecy, Senior Pastor, Campus Bible Church, answers the question Why is a defense of the reliability of the Bible important?

 
Bulgarian evangelicals ask politicians to defend “basic freedoms” Bulgarian evangelicals ask politicians to defend “basic freedoms”

Protests and prayers continue in Bulgaria for the sixth week.

 
That night That night

“No one came ot help that night, no nurse to numb the fright...”

 
 
Follow us on Soundcloud
Follow us on YouTube
 
 
WE RECOMMEND
 
PARTNERS
 

 
AEE
EVANGELICAL FOCUS belongs to Areópago Protestante, linked to the Spanish Evangelical Alliance (AEE). AEE is member of the European
Evangelical Alliance and World Evangelical Alliance.
 

Opinions expressed are those of their respective contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of Evangelical Focus.