Making sense of the second “age of Trump”
Evangelicals globally are divided over Trump. But whatever our views, we can represent the gospel better by adopting a more servantlike politics.
23 JANUARY 2025 · 09:52 CET

On Monday, the second inauguration of Donald Trump as United States president introduced a new chapter in the puzzling relationship between Trump and evangelical Christians.
Much of the world struggles to understand why a bombastic man who took steps to overturn the 2020 election after losing it, encouraged a riot at the US Capitol, has now pardoned the rioters (even those who attacked police officers), has talked about using military force in Greenland and Panama, and is threatening to slap tariffs on his friendly neighbors in Canada still receives such strong support from evangelicals.
Many Christians who do not admire Trump have still felt obliged to vote for him in a two-party system where the other party has moved far to the left on abortion, sexuality, and “woke” issues
Globally, opinions among Christians are divided. A Christianity Today article after Trump’s re-election described favorable reaction to his victory among evangelicals in Iran, Nepal, Kenya, and the Philippines but markedly less enthusiasm in the UK, South Africa, Japan, and Brazil.
The general pattern seems to be that in countries with religious persecution or where most Christians resist LGBT legitimacy, Trump’s win was widely welcomed; in more culturally progressive nations where Trump’s perceived close relationship with evangelicals is a source of embarrassment, his victory perpetuated the problem.
There is great diversity among Christians but all should embody the gospel through their love, respect, and compassion for every human made in the image of God
But all Christians, regardless of their views on other topics, should embody the gospel through their love, respect, and compassion for every human made in the image of God.
I attended an academic panel discussion shortly after the US presidential election. When I spoke with the organizer afterwards, we agreed that the panel was skewed—none of the four participants were happy that Trump won. But we also agreed that it would have been nearly impossible to find a Trump defender, especially a Christian Trump defender, willing to engage in a friendly, respectful, well-informed, constructive conversation.
That’s sad.
A large segment of Christians becomes so ensnared in polarizing culture wars—or so distanced from civil discourse—that reasonable people don’t invite them into conversations
This is likely one main reason why, in a Pew poll two years ago, evangelicals had the highest unfavorable ratings among major US religious groups. The results would have been even worse if not for the fact that evangelicals had high opinions of themselves.
Where can we go from here, so as to represent the gospel well in the age of Trump—whether we like his policies or not? I have two suggestions.
Where we do enter the political realm, we should do so with a spirit of public service, not grievance
Second, where we do enter the political realm, we should do so with a spirit of public service, not grievance and anger.
Even if we feel exasperated by Trump’s unlikely to return to power and its potential risks, we should maintain patient, grace-filled faith in a sovereign God whose plan and power are greater than Trump’s.
Bruce Barron, author or coauthor of seven books on religion and politics and a former US congressional aide, was editor of the World Evangelical Alliance’s theology journal from 2018 to 2024. Subscribe to his blog at brucebarron.substack.com.
Join us to make EF sustainable
Learn all about our #OneMoreYearEF campaign here (English).
Published in: Evangelical Focus - North American perspectives - Making sense of the second “age of Trump”